yolo26、yolo11精度对比简单记录(免费)
·
yolo26、yolo11精度对比简单记录(免费)
文章免费(如遇VIP免费请联系本人)
注意:平台每隔一段时间会自动设置为VIP免费,如遇到请联系本人
yolo26、yolo11精度对比结果
yolo11
Ultralytics 8.4.8 Python-3.10.8 torch-2.3.1+cu118 CUDA:0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 24564MiB) YOLO11s summary (fused): 100 layers, 9,413,187 parameters, 0 gradients, 21.3 GFLOPs val: Fast image access (ping: 0.00.0 ms, read: 3666.31787.2 MB/s, size: 564.4 KB) val: Scanning Class Images Instances Box(P R mAP50 mAP50-95): 100% ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 676/676 13.3it/s 50.8s all 2704 14614 0.885 0.893 0.933 0.685 Speed: 4.5ms preprocess, 11.9ms inference, 0.0ms loss, 0.5ms postprocess per image ================================================== small objects: 3465 medium objects: 9673 large objects: 1476 ================================================== Evaluate annotation type *bbox* COCOeval_opt.evaluate() finished... DONE (t=0.30s). Accumulating evaluation results... COCOeval_opt.accumulate() finished... DONE (t=0.00s). Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.684 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.933 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.787 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.526 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.701 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.845 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.128 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.557 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.755 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.660 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.770 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.878 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.986 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.858
yolo26
Ultralytics 8.4.8 Python-3.10.8 torch-2.3.1+cu118 CUDA:0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 24564MiB) YOLO26s summary (fused): 122 layers, 9,465,567 parameters, 0 gradients, 20.5 GFLOPs val: Fast image access (ping: 0.00.0 ms, read: 2840.01236.5 MB/s, size: 486.8 KB) val: Scanning Class Images Instances Box(P R mAP50 mAP50-95): 100% ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 676/676 12.4it/s 54.7s all 2704 14614 0.89 0.889 0.934 0.657 Speed: 4.7ms preprocess, 13.5ms inference, 0.0ms loss, 0.1ms postprocess per image ================================================== small objects: 3465 medium objects: 9673 large objects: 1476 ================================================== Evaluate annotation type *bbox* COCOeval_opt.evaluate() finished... DONE (t=0.31s). Accumulating evaluation results... COCOeval_opt.accumulate() finished... DONE (t=0.00s). Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.656 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.933 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.783 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.517 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.679 Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.781 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.122 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.536 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.735 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.642 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.753 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.826 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.984 Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.865
图片结果

总结
其中yolo26 mAP50-95指标为0.656、yolo11 mAP50-95指标为0.684,yolo26低于yolo11
mAP50指标二者相似
其他
yolov8(Ultralytics系列)快速入门(免费)
https://blog.csdn.net/baidu_34487688/article/details/155073848
更多推荐
所有评论(0)